Last week there was a small win for us, the little people here in Canada, against our governments political persecution of the Coutts men. For details, watch Plea Deals w/ Marco van Huigenbos & Chris Scott and Coutts Corruption w/ Maxime Bernier. For a shorter 15 minute summary, watch Shadoe at Nite Tues. Feb. 6th/2024 starting at time 00:09:05.
In short, two of the four Coutts men, Chris Lysak and Jerry Morin, have finally been released from remand, their pre-trial purgatory for over 700 days without bail. What they pleaded guilty to was relatively minor in comparison to the serious charges in their original indictments; conspiring to murder RCMP/police, having weapons for dangerous purposes, mischief over $5,000 and blocking infrastructure. One week these men are considered terrorists too dangerous to be released on bail. The next week every single serious charge has been dropped and they are free men with no conditions other than a few firearm restrictions. How do they go from terrorists conspiring to murder RCMP to free men in such short time?
In laymen terms, the highest level of government in Canada and Alberta along with the highest level in the RCMP manufactured a fake crisis at the Coutts protest, bringing false charges against the protesters. This was used as justification by the liberal government in Ottawa to invoke the Emergencies Act that, in turn, was used to crush the Ottawa Freedom Convoy in February 2022. The Trudeau government had no intention of hearing the legitimate grievances of the protest in Ottawa and was looking for an excuse to crush it. Coutts was that excuse.
Trudeau, Freeland, Lametti, Kenney and other top officials destroyed the lives of these Coutts protesters for politically motivated reasons. The stench of corruption goes well beyond Canada to foreign entities such as Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum. Everything about Coutts makes an utter mockery of our political, legal and law enforcement systems. These systems have been weaponized against us, the little people. Those arrested at Coutts were and are political prisoners whose only crime was to exercise their rights-by-law to peaceful protest against flagrant overreach by all levels of our governments.
The overriding lesson from the Coutts scandal is that the prevailing rule of law is might-is-right!
It is reasonable to assume our political, legal and law enforcement officials that engineered this scandal and travesty of justice understood it could not be hidden forever. They were not and are still not concerned because they will remain unaccountable. They will move from public office to private office or private life, with their high paying salaries, pensions and/or assets fully intact. Yes, Kenney was booted out of office in Alberta but that is hardly holding him to account. These people are untouchable. That reflects the prevailing rule of law, might is right.
Serious criminal charges were made against those arrested at Coutts based on nothing more than allegations. Even after two years, no evidence has been presented to support those allegations. Our top officials were fully aware that what they were doing was illegal. They proceeded anyway, heedless and uncaring of the lives they would destroy. It is these high placed officials that are the real criminals. They were and still are following foreign driven agendas. They knew the clot-kill shots (i.e. ‘vaccines’) would kill thousands of Canadian. So what then is a few months of solitary confinement and two years of remand without bail that only breaks a mans spirit and body? That is ruthless power and reflects the prevailing rule of law, might is right.
The Rouleau commission concluded Trudeau was justified in invoking the Emergencies Act, largely on the basis of the official (but fraudulent) Coutts narrative. Nevertheless, it was clear that Trudeau had illegally invoked the Emergencies Act and this has been confirmed by the recent federal court ruling by Justice Mosley. In addition, the official Coutts narrative has now all but collapsed. The Coutts scandal makes an utter mockery of our law, much like the Nuremberg trials where German prisoners were relentlessly tortured into signing confessions in English, a language they could not speak or write. The liberal appointed Rouleau whitewashed the commissions conclusions. That is power and reflects the prevailing rule of law, might is right.
Until very only recently, the weight of our political, legal and law enforcement systems was brought to bear against these four Coutts men as well as the others arrested at Coutts. They were effectively alone, vulnerable and completely unaware of the scale and scope of what they were up against. The powers that be intentionally put them through a figurative meat grinder, to break them. These men have been broken. That is raw power and reflects the prevailing rule of law, might is right.
How did Lysak and Morin go from being terrorists one week to free men the next week? Tucker Carlson helped bring some awareness as did Jeremy Mackenzie and his Diagolon group. But Marco and Jason say the real change came after Lysak’s team recently retaining the services of Daniel Song. Marco describes Daniel as the best of the best of criminal lawyers. Daniel’s retainer for Lysak was $200,000. Legal fees for lawyers like Song can range from $20,000 per week to over $40,000 per week. Song has generously discounted his fees by $80,000 but, even then, that is well beyond the means of average Canadians. Now consider what is happening in the Tony Olienick camp. Tony recently dropped his lawyer. At that point, the lawyer had already been paid $550,000 and Tony was given an invoice for an outstanding amount of $120,000. That is $670,000!!!! How much more money will Tony need to retain the services of another lawyer? Again, keep in mind at that point the four Coutts men were only at pre-trial. The average Canadian simply cannot afford or raise these outrageous legal costs, especially when (s)he is sitting behind bars and not making money. Money is power. No money? No power, no justice! That reflects the prevailing rule of law, might is right.
Getting back to Daniel Song, as Marco has reasonably speculated, the crown prosecutors recognized they were up against a formidable defense lawyer, knew they were on shaky ground and understood that Daniel was calling their bluff (i.e. the sealed wiretap information). Indeed, after two years, the prosecutors still have no evidence to bring a conviction against Chris Lysak. So the crown prosecutors dropped ALL OF THE ORIGINAL CHARGES and agreed to plea deal of much lesser charges. In other words, it took the figurative strong-arm-might of one of Canada’s best defense lawyers to crack open Chris Lysak’s case. That reflects the prevailing rule of law, might is right.
Now let’s look at a comparable situation concerning Chris Carbert from the crown prosecutors point of view. Jason Lavigne states (watch this at time 00:22:50) that “the crown was adamant that he (Chris) was going to get four life sentences, that they had all the evidence and he (Chris) would get it”. However, only a short time later, two of the four Coutts men are now free. As with Lysak, after two years, the crown prosecutors have no evidence to bring a conviction against Carbert. If the crown prosecutors never had the evidence, and that is almost a certainty now, then they knowingly lied when they asserted Chris would be severely punished with multiple life sentences. They were bluffing with a flagrant lie that promised to finally and completely destroy an innocent man’s life along with that of his family. That is such an egregious abuse of our legal system that the question must be asked as to why the prosecutors are not worried about being held accountable. The only answer is that they expect to be protected against any fallout from this travesty of justice. That reflects the prevailing rule of law, might is right.
Now let’s quickly look at the fund raising activities to pay lawyer fees because they too directly reflect the principle of might is right. Lysak was only able to retain the services of Daniel Song because a small community of people came together across Canada to crowd fund Lysak’s legal costs. People like Marco van Huigenbos, Jason Lavigne and Jeremy Mackenzie out of necessity had to bring together a group to do what no single person in that group could do. They worked together to fight for and to protect one of their own. As I have repeatedly stated, we are in a numbers game. The only way we can win this global war of Technocracy and Transhumanism is with our large scale numbers, working together with a common vision and direction. That was played out on a small scale with the community effort to crowd fund Lysaks legal costs. What Marco, Jason and Jeremy have done and are continuing to do hints at we can accomplish if we play to our only strength, our numbers. But even that reflects the prevailing rule of law, might is right. No numbers? No might, no right!
After 4 years, the so called “freedom community” in Canada is still heavily fragmented and completely disorganized. We are up against the global army of Technocracy and Transhumanism. We, the little people, have observed and experienced first hand that that army conducts itself by the principle of might-is-right. We must respond in kind.
There are 4 major components or things that the so called “freedom community” in Canada lacks; 1) unity, 2) large scale numbers, 3) a wartime mindset and 4) the principle of might-is-right. We must acquire all 4 components. For without them, we are guaranteed to lose this war of Technocracy and Transhumanism that is being waged against us, the little people.